A Quality Improvement Project to Improve the Efficiency of Pulmonary Nodule Service at a Tertiary Centre

Introduction: With the increasing detection of incidental pulmonary nodules (IPNs), there is a clinical need for a dedicated IPN service to ensure that growing PNs are managed in a timely manner. Pre COVID-19, our centre ran a virtual nodule service, delivered on an ad-hoc basis by the lung cancer physicians. We hypothesised that efficiency of the service would improve with a dedicated nodule team. We were awarded a pump priming grant by the Thames Valley Cancer Alliance to implement a nodule navigator run service. We report the initial outcomes of this project here. Objective(s): To evaluate the PN navigator service. Method(s): Retrospective data pre-service development was collected from patients presenting to the PN service between April and June 2022. The service was established in October 2022 and data from October and November 2022 collected. Student t-test was used to compare means. [Table presented] Results: 107 patients were included pre-service and 92 patients in the post-service development cohorts. Data for time to CT report and patient contact are summarised in Table 1. There was no reduction in mean time from CT scan date to CT report (Table 1;31vs 27;p=0.143) but a reduction was seen between CT report and patient contact (Table 1, 45 vs 20;p<0.001). Conclusion(s): This small cohort study shows an improvement in the time between CT scan and patient contact following the introduction of a dedicated PN service. This may reduce delays in the diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer. Whilst there was no significant difference between the CT scan date and CT report, these data highlight an area in the pathway that can improve. Further aims of the project are to collect patient satisfaction and IPN discharge. Disclosure: No significant relationships.Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V.

Utility of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular lymph node sampling in lung cancer diagnosis – remodelling the pathway in the era of COVID-19

Introduction: Ultrasound guided sampling (USGS) of supraclavicular lymph nodes (SCLN) is a minimally invasive method for obtaining cytological diagnosis in metastatic lung cancer. Same day USGS service may improve timeliness of investigations, minimise hospital visits and reduce invasive procedures. Methods: We performed a 3-year retrospective analysis of patients with SCLN amenable to biopsy detect-ed on 2 week-wait (2WW) CT. We identified those who underwent USGS or other procedures, diagnostic yield and their timeliness were determined. Results: 49 patients (26%) had amenable SCLN, of whom 37 (75.5%) had USGS. USGS alone sufficient for 27 (73%) patients. Diagnostic yield is better for larger nodes (<1cm 62.5% positive;≥1cm 86.2% positive, 95% CI 0.13-0.93, p=0.011). The overall diagnostic yield of USGS SCLN was 81% (30/37, 95% CI 65% to 92%). Al-though faster to obtain USGS, no statistically significant difference was reached between USGS and other methods (USGS median 15.5 days (IQR 11.2), other procedures median 17.5 days (IQR 26.5), Mann-Whitney U p=0.42). Conclusion: USGS SCLN has potential utility in early lung cancer diagnosis, even in lymph nodes <1cm, and is an underutilized diagnostic investigation. A prospective study of same day 2WW outpatient clinic and USGS procedure is now required to assess its effect on an accelerated diagnostic pathway. © 2022, Zita Medical Managent. All rights reserved.

Parenchymal involvement on CT pulmonary angiography in SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant infection and correlation of COVID-19 CT severity score with clinical disease severity and short-term prognosis in a UK cohort.

AIM: To determine if there is a difference in radiological, biochemical, or clinical severity between patients infected with Alpha-variant SARS-CoV-2 compared with those infected with pre-existing strains, and to determine if the computed tomography (CT) severity score (CTSS) for COVID-19 pneumonitis correlates with clinical severity and can prognosticate outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blinded CTSS scoring was applied to 137 hospital patients who had undergone both CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and whole-genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 within 14 days of CTPA between 1/12/20-5/1/21. RESULTS: There was no evidence of a difference in imaging severity on CTPA, viral load, clinical parameters of severity, or outcomes between Alpha and preceding variants. CTSS on CTPA strongly correlates with clinical and biochemical severity at the time of CTPA, and with patient outcomes. Classifying CTSS into a binary value of "high" and "low", with a cut-off score of 14, patients with a high score have a significantly increased risk of deterioration, as defined by subsequent admission to critical care or death (multivariate hazard ratio [HR] 2.76, p<0.001), and hospital length of stay (17.4 versus 7.9 days, p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of a difference in radiological severity of Alpha variant infection compared with pre-existing strains. High CTSS applied to CTPA is associated with increased risk of COVID-19 severity and poorer clinical outcomes and may be of use particularly in settings where CT is not performed for diagnosis of COVID-19 but rather is used following clinical deterioration.

Chest CT screening for COVID-19 in elective and emergency surgical patients: experience from a UK tertiary centre.

AIM: To determine the incidence of possible COVID-19-related lung changes on preoperative screening computed tomography (CT) for COVID-19 and how their findings influenced decision-making. To also to determine whether the patients were managed as COVID-19 patients after their imaging findings, and the proportion who had SARS-CoV2 reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of consecutive patients having imaging prior to urgent elective surgery (n=156) or acute abdominal imaging (n=283). Lung findings were categorised according to the British Society of Thoracic Imaging (BSTI) guidelines. RT-PCR testing, management, and outcomes were determined from the electronic patient records. RESULTS: 3% (13/439) of CT examinations demonstrated findings of classic/probable COVID-19 pneumonia, whilst 4% (19/439) had findings indeterminate for COVID-19. Of the total cohort, 1.6% (7/439) subsequently had confirmed RT-PCR-positive COVID-19. Importantly, all the patients with a normal chest or alternative diagnoses on CT who had PCR testing within the next 7 days, had a negative RT-PCR (92/407). There was a change in surgical outcome in 6% (10/156) of the elective surgical cohort with no change to surgical management was demonstrated in the acute abdominal emergency cohort requiring surgery (2/283). CONCLUSION: There was a 7% (32/439) incidence of potential COVID-19-related lung changes in patients having preoperative CT. Although this altered surgical management in the elective surgical cohort, no change to surgical management was demonstrated in the acute abdominal emergency cohort requiring surgery.